$SALVAZION: The Patriotic Bitcoin

Now that you know our purpose, the values ​​we uphold, and the legacy we're building, we'll explain why $SALVAZION will become the Patriotic Bitcoin.

The original vision of Bitcoin as a decentralized, peer-to-peer electronic cash system—free from central authority and resistant to censorship—has been increasingly compromised by institutional capture and centralization trends. Globalist metacapitalists, exemplified by firms like BlackRock, have amassed significant influence over Bitcoin through ETFs and corporate holdings, including stakes in major Bitcoin accumulators like MicroStrategy.

This shift undermines Bitcoin's core principles of sovereignty and decentralization, necessitating a "Patriotic Bitcoin", which defends Western Christian Culture, BioConservatism and Anti-Globalist Woke.

Below are key reasons supporting this need.

1. Institutional Capture by Globalist Entities Erodes Decentralization

Bitcoin's network was intended to be distributed among individuals and small miners, but massive institutional ownership has centralized control over its price and accessibility.

BlackRock's iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) alone holds over 800,000 BTC in assets under management, representing a dominant share of the U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF market.

With BlackRock controlling about 60% of U.S. Bitcoin ETF assets, this creates a "stranglehold" on the ecosystem, allowing a single global firm to influence market dynamics far beyond the decentralized ideal.

This centralization extends to indirect control via investments in Bitcoin-heavy companies like MicroStrategy, where BlackRock holds approximately 5-5.8% ownership (around 11-14 million shares), making it a top institutional shareholder.

Combined, BlackRock and MicroStrategy now hold more BTC than Satoshi Nakamoto's estimated stash, concentrating power in corporate hands rather than the global network.

1. Mining and Network Centralization Threaten Security and Sovereignty

Beyond ownership, Bitcoin's mining has become highly centralized, with a few large pools dominating hash rate and raising fears of 51% attacks that could compromise the blockchain's integrity.

Experts describe this as a "major crisis," where governments and corporations could puppet the network, morphing Bitcoin into a centralized entity.

In 2025, this re-centralization undermines Bitcoin's promise of censorship resistance, as institutional players like BlackRock amplify their sway through financial levers.

1. Economic Dependency on Wall Street Undermines Bitcoin's Anti-Establishment Roots

The influx of institutional money, led by BlackRock's $93.9 billion in crypto assets under management, has tied Bitcoin's fate to traditional finance, making it vulnerable to market manipulations and economic policies dictated by metacapitalists.

Without BlackRock's inflows, U.S. spot Bitcoin ETF balances would be negative, highlighting how the ecosystem now depends on a single entity's participation rather than organic, decentralized growth.

This shift transforms Bitcoin from a revolutionary asset into an "asset of fear" integrated with fiat systems, as noted by BlackRock's CEO, eroding its role as a hedge against globalism.

1. Cultural and Ideological Subversion by Globalist Agendas

Globalist Metacapitalists like BlackRock promote a borderless, homogenized financial world that aligns with broader ideologies eroding national identities. Institutionalization challenges Bitcoin's decentralized soul, turning it into a tool for centralized power despite its blockchain facade.

Concerns in 2025 highlight an "illusion of decentralization," where BTC's on-chain limitations and growing centralization favor elite control over peer-to-peer empowerment.

By controlling key players like MicroStrategy through significant stakes, these entities steer Bitcoin toward globalist priorities, such as ESG integration or regulatory compliance that stifles innovation.

A Patriotic Bitcoin would reclaim the cypherpunk ethos with nationalist twists to foster a currency that bolsters patriotic economies.

1. Long-Term Risks to Freedom and Innovation

Centralization paths, as analyzed in 2025 reports, show Bitcoin's interest waning amid institutional dominance, risking stagnation or collapse under global pressures.

Without intervention, Bitcoin could fully devolve into a Wall Street proxy, losing its utility as a decentralized store of value.

In summary, Bitcoin's capture by entities like BlackRock—through massive ETF holdings and stakes in firms like MicroStrategy—has rendered it insufficiently decentralized, serving globalist interests over individual or national empowerment.

A Patriotic Bitcoin is essential to restore true sovereignty, protect against centralization, and align digital finance with patriotic values, preventing the original cryptocurrency from becoming just another tool of the elite.